“The book was better,” people always say. And in most cases, that is correct. Books can give much more detail and get deeply
into a character’s thoughts and perceptions.
But in a small number of cases, the film adaptation of a book is, in
fact, better than the book.
Rumble Fish is one of those rare beasts.
Based on S. E. Hinton’s slim novel, Francis Ford Coppola’s
surreal, dream-like film was shot back-to-back with his adaptation of Hinton’s
wildly successful The Outsiders and used many of the same cast and crew. Yet the two films could not be more different in
style, tone and look.
Shot almost entirely in black and white (only the titular
rumble fish or Siamese fighting fish are in color), this film shows a darker,
grittier side of Tulsa. Against the
backdrop of stylised urban decay Matt Dillon’s Rusty James struggles to find
his place in the world. Mickey Rourke
plays the older brother he idolises, an enigmatic figure known only as The
Motorcycle Boy.
The film focuses more intently on the relationship between
the brothers than the book which explores Rusty James’s dependent friendship
with Steve alongside his hero-worship of his brother. In the film, Steve is still present, but is
more a sidekick than a central figure. But
his role in pointing out The Motorcycle Boy’s flaws remains the same in both.
The question of The Motorcycle Boy’s sanity is brought up
time and again throughout the film.
Rusty James isn’t sure what to believe about him, while Steve grows to believe he is unstable. The cop
who is out to get both brothers is convinced he’s mad, but the boys’ drunkard
father (played with delightful roguishness by Dennis Hopper) believes The
Motorcycle Boy just sees the world differently to others. With less context to the film's ending than the book gives us, the central question of The Motorcycle Boy's mental state is left to the audience to decide.
This uncertainty about one of the central characters is
heightened by the film’s production design and cinematography which create
weird shadows and angles, time sped up in places and slowed down in
others. There is a constant sense of
unreality even when what is playing out on screen is mundane and all too real. This is underscored by Stewart Copeland’s eerie
soundtrack which adds to the disorientation that permeates the film.
Essentially an art film, Rumble Fish is filled with symbolism
to highlight its themes. Clocks spinning
wildly suggest that time is running away from these characters. And the titular fish evoke the world these teens
live in – a world in which they will fight to the death for their place in
it. There is a sense that they are
trapped, like fish in a bowl, fighting for space to survive.
I love this film and would not hesitate to suggest that it is Mickey Rourke’s finest on-screen performance. He has swagger and charisma, yet manages at the same time to be enigmatic and unapproachable. His relationship with Rusty James swings between bemused affection and total disinterest and can change on a dime. This too adds to the unsettling nature of the film – a wildly unpredictable character can keep the audience on edge.
This is my favorite adaptation of an S E Hinton novel even if it doesn't fit comfortably into either the teen movie genre or that of the art film. Have you seen this film? What did you think? Better than the book or not?
Not familiar with this one, but I read her book 'That was then, this is now' as a teenager and it had a huge impact on me.
ReplyDelete