Monday, June 5, 2017

Why the Standard “Author Platform” Doesn’t Work

Welcome back to guest blogger, A.P. Fuchs. He's spent well over a decade in the business and has seen many trends come and go. Thanks for sharing with all the readers at Operation Awesome!
******

All right, let’s talk straight. Specifically, let’s talk author platforms. You’ve read the articles. You’ve been told how important they are. You’ve been given a list of what to include. Heck, you’ve even taken all that information to heart and acted upon it.

And the book sales aren’t happening.

So you keep at it, hoping one day it’ll all pay off. Day in and day out you bust your tail on social media and the Web only to keep missing your goal sales-wise. Or, perhaps, you hit it some months and others you wonder what it’s all for. Frustration sets in and you don’t know what’s going on. You did what Author A said. You got your Facebook page, your Twitter account, your blog, your Instagram and all the others—yet still you’re just another author voice shouting into the storm.

Here’s the issue: you’re following someone else’s advice. Worse, you’re following it to the letter and in the game of publishing, following the author platform advice to a T is a death sentence.

This is why:

▪ Publishing is a giant crapshoot. There is no sure-fire way to do anything. Anyone who tells you otherwise is either lying or trying to sell you something. While true there are basics and groundwork you can lay, that’s all those things are. Yes, your standard author platform recipe should be part of your game plan. That’s no different than saying you want to sell your book but you know you can’t sell your manuscript as is. You need to make it pretty and put it between two covers before you can do so. That’s a given. The basics.

▪ The standard author platform isn’t working for you is because you aren’t making it yours. You’re making it like someone else’s or, simply, following the basic recipe without adding the personal tender loving touch that makes your cookies taste better than the other guy’s.

This is how to fix the issue, written step-by-step, but don’t treat it like an instruction manual. Customization, you know?

Step one:

Lay down the standard recipe. All good baking has a fairly consistent base across the board. Have your Facebook page, your Twitter, blog, Instagram and all that. Customize each page and make it about you and your books then commit to a Web plan where you’re active on each on a regular basis.

Step two:

Start adding the TLC. Don’t make your Facebook page like Joe Famous’s. Make it like yours.

I hate the word “brand” when it comes to this author stuff. It turns us into a product and, frankly, art is never about product. It can become a product, but should never be a product. See the difference? This world is sickly loaded with consumerism and people pushing products non-stop twenty-four hours a day. Most of us have tuned out the racket. But what draws us and captures our attention? Unique items and unique people. This so-called “brand” you’re supposed to become? How about voice? After all, your voice is what makes your art what it is to begin with. Why turn that off when sharing it with people?

So . . .

Format and design your pages to reflect you and your books. Don’t be all authorish. Don’t be all bookish. Don’t make people feel like they’re in a stuffy library when they visit you on the Web. In other words, don’t be so professional you come off as cold. Cold people suck.

Into baking or crafts? Build that into your page designs and content.

Into superheroes and comics? Put up some indie superhero character art as part of your banner and pictures.

Into sci-fi and tech? Give your page(s) a mechanical flare and make the electro-junkies squee on the inside when they visit you.

Into horror? Spook it up, man.

Get the idea?

Step three:

With your on-line base of operations already established, leave it alone for a bit and start playing around with other marketing ideas.

Some items . . .

▪ Set up book signings. Table at conventions. Hook up with some craft shows and flea markets. Arrange a book tour, say, local at first then, depending on success, look at traveling out-of-province/state, even country.

▪ Set yourself up as a unique property at these events. Don’t just have a plain table. Add some posters and signage. Add some props. Display your books in a pyramid-like tower. Stand out. Fool around. Don’t be the lonely author who sits there with a handful of books laid out boring and flat in front of them, longingly gazing at the passersby, your eyes pleading, “Please come talk to me. Please come buy my book.” I mean, you took all this time to personalize your on-line presence, why wouldn’t you do the same for your off-line one?

▪ Casually bring up you’re an author into everyday conversations. You can subtly work your pitch into whatever you’re talking about with someone—choose appropriately, of course—and at a bare minimum leave them with a business card. But have books on-hand or in your car in case a sale is to be made. Trust me, it happens.

▪ Go to open mic nights and share story excerpts or poetry. This is your chance to pimp your work, network and perhaps get hired for new projects.

▪ Do workshops.

And a thousand other things. These examples are to make this point: lay your groundwork—that author platform—then play around with other marketing avenues. You’ll be surprised what works. You’ll also be surprised at what doesn’t because what works for Author A doesn’t always work for Author B.

Book marketing is all about customization. It’s about finding what works for you and putting energy into those things while discarding the things that don’t after you’ve given them a fair chance (i.e. six months to a year or something). And you know what? Even that thing you did that didn’t work for your first novel might be the goldmine that works for your second one. Each book is different. Even each book in a series is different.

Authors want the easy way out. “I just want to write,” they say. Well, if that were really true, you wouldn’t be publishing as well, right?

Or they want to be told what to do: that standard author platform recipe. Come on. How can you be so creative in fiction then totally useless outside of it? Don’t you know your life is a story and so is your book career? That creative flare that you put on the page can be used off of it, too. Stop thinking inside of your book and start thinking outside of it.

After this article is drafted, my plan for the day is to revisit my platform, one that I’ve already customized to me over the years—self-publishing since 2004—and take inventory on what’s working and what isn’t. I’m going to make some changes and try new things. Going to add my own TLC instead of relying on the standard Author Platform recipe.

I’m eager to see how these cookies turn out. I already know my zombie chocolate chip ones are dead ringers for a win and my Axiom-man cookies are super.

Screw the standard author platform. It’s boring and useless. But your own? The one with your personal touch?

That’s something special.

Get to it.

About the Author: An independent writer and cartoonist, A.P. Fuchs has been part of the underground publishing scene for twelve years. He is the author of more than forty books, loads of comics, short stories and poetry, and has a weekly newsletter called The Canister X Transmission, in which he currently discusses publishing and marketing tips, past work, indie creator spotlights and whatever’s on his mind that week. Heck, he’s so passionate about writing and publishing he even wrote several books on the subject, one a collection of the first year of his weekly newsletter, another called Getting Down and Digital: How to Self-publish Your Book. Plus a few others. Sign up for his newsletter at www.tinyletter.com/apfuchs and get a free thriller e-novelette out of the deal, and be sure to visit him on-line at his main hub at www.canisterx.com

Friday, June 2, 2017

May Pass Or Pages Entry 5

It's feedback reveal time for Pass or Pages, the query contest run at here Operation Awesome. We hope you'll find tips to benefit your own work and query letters. Copious thanks to our agent panel for taking the time to critique these entries. We give obeisance to all authors, especially those who participated in this round of Pass or Pages. The only path to success is by trying, the surest path to failure is to not try. Bravo to those entered.







Entry 5: LIFE, DEATH, AND HIGH SCHOOL



Query:


16-year-old Olivia’s fate[WA1] hangs on the beeps and blips of a heart monitor.[LO1] Her best friend detaches [WA2], her boyfriend Dylan gets needy [WA3], but all she can think about is a little boy in a coma and the brake pedal she didn’t have time to hit.[LC1]

While Olivia attempts to magical-think the boy alive, [LO2] Dylan’s obsession with Olivia grows. When she breaks up with him, he knows exactly what the problem is. Or, rather, who. A pillow is so easy to hold over a little boy’s face. [WA4][LO3]

LIFE, DEATH, AND HIGH SCHOOL [LC2]is a contemporary young adult novel complete at 55,000 words. It is told through multiple POVs in a multimedia journal format, including audio [WA5], written, and graphic entries. This novel might appeal to fans of Jennifer Mathieu’s THE TRUTH ABOUT ALICE and Amber Smith’s THE WAY I USED TO BE.[LO4]

Thank you for your time and consideration. [WA6]



**********

Whitley's Notes:
[WA1]: What is meant by “fate”? What happens if he dies? (e.g., She can’t forgive herself? Or she goes to jail for manslaughter?)
[WA2]: This bit feels out of place, since the best friend is never named and isn’t included in the rest of the query.
[WA3]: There’s a big leap from needy to obsessed and willing to kill. Is this obsession a major plotline? Or just plot point?
[WA4]I need more here. I don’t have a clear sense of what this story is going to be. Is it the “magical thinking” leading up Dylan trying to kill (or actualy killing) the little boy? Or is it the aftermath… and if so, what IS the aftermath?
[WA5]: By audio, do you mean audio transcriptios? Or actual audio readers would have to listen to?
[WA6]: Overall, this query needs more focus. I need to have a stronger sense of what, exactly, this book is tackling.


Laura's Notes:
[LC1]: This opening is confusing. Is Olivia the one with the heart monitor, or the little boy? Introduce the situation more clearly.
[LC2]: When the title appeared, I immediately thought, “Wait…that’s it?” I have the whole story right here. Where’s the suspense, intrigue, mystery? I would stop reading here, quite befuddled.



Lorin's Notes:
[LO1]: The suggestion here is that it’s her heart monitor, rather than another person’s. It feels a bit disorienting to get to the end of the paragraph and find out it’s really her “victim’s” monitor. Might establish the fact of her accident earlier on. E.g., “After a devastating accident, 16-year-old Olivia’s fact…” etc.
[LO2]: I’m afraid this suggests a rather inert character in Olivia, since you haven’t presented a real driving goal for her. Obviously, her scenes can’t be built around her thinking and wishing, so what is she doing during the narrative? What goal is she trying to reach, and how does that move her through the story?
[LO3]: I’d love to know if Dylan actually kills the boy and Olivia’s quest is to prove he did it, or if she somehow gets wind of his plan and her quest is to stop him. Certainly a compelling detail.
[LO4]: I’m intrigued by the multimedia format, but I’d love for the query to suggest a narrative scope that will make those elements organic and necessary. Not quite seeing that here, unfortunately.


First 250 words



Dear Officer Jones:

Please let me state again for the record that I do not believe it is right to force me to hand over these journals. I promised my students I wouldn’t read them, and for you, I’ve broken that promise. I hope you find it was worth it.

I selected entries that I thought were the most relevant to this case. One per week, that’s all they were assigned. It’s poetry, all of it. I hope you see that.


Sincerely,

Helen Bhattacharya[LO1]

WEEK ONE: MONDAY


JENNA


My best friend died last night. [LO2] Not in the technical sense, not in the actual sense, but she’ll never again be the Olivia I grew up with. In that way, she’s gone. Dead. Something new might take her place or maybe not. I don’t know.[LO3]

I don’t want to talk about it. I don’t want to write about it. I don’t want to think. I just want to not. It’s been the only thing in the world since last night, the only think[LC1], and I need to stop. I’ve never been so happy to come to school.[LO4]

I guess I should write about our school, because I don’t want to write about the other thing. I need to practice describing things, anyway. Mr. Mintz says the scene descriptions in my one-act need more detail. So Laura Dixon High School is really old, like 1800s old.[LO5]



**********

Whitley's Notes:
N/A

Laura's Notes:
[LC1]: I’d stop right here with the spelling error. There is mostly telling in this opening (and not telling, as this narrator doesn’t want to talk about it. Why would I continue listening?) going on, and a quick glance shows it continues in this vein. A narrator avoiding the topic/mystery/intrigue can be done in a more clever, showing way without the narrator declaring they don’t want to talk about it.


Lorin's Notes:
[LO1]: I’m not sure you’re served by having an adult voice open the narrative.  You might present the entries without the context and reveal that they’re part of an ongoing class assignment later on in the piece.
[LO2]: Compelling line.
[LO3]: It doesn’t feel reasonable to me that Jenna would have this perspective, which takes such a long view, the night after the accident. Instead of being so abstract/philosophical, I wonder if you might weave in more concrete detail about the accident itself here. Even if you don’t want to lay out the specifics because of a big narrative reveal to come, you might still start building world, characters, and conflict(s) here.
[LO4]: Is it likely she’d be in school the day after her best friend was involved in such an accident?
[LO5]: I’m afraid this might come across as a bit author-driven rather than character-driven. If she’s going to describe something, would the school itself be her first choice, or would she home in on some element of her classroom--the mood of it, post-accident, perhaps? Or some aspect of her friends/other students? Even though she doesn’t want to think about the accident, I would think the fact of it would permeate everything. It also seems to me that you have an opportunity to build in some mystery/intrigue around the circumstances of the accident. Perhaps intimate that there are questions still to be answered. Build some tension between what Jenna believes about it and what others seem to fit. We need more here to draw us into the book and prompt us to turn pages.

Results:


Whitley: PASS 
Laura: PASS
Lorin: PASS 


Thursday, June 1, 2017

May Pass Or Pages Entry 4

It's feedback reveal time for Pass or Pages, the query contest run at here Operation Awesome. We hope you'll find tips to benefit your own work and query letters. Copious thanks to our agent panel for taking the time to critique these entries. We give obeisance to all authors, especially those who participated in this round of Pass or Pages. The only path to success is by trying, the surest path to failure is to not try. Bravo to those entered.





Entry 4: THE EDGE OF HAPPINESS



Query:


After her mother dies and her sister runs away with a drug addict [WA1], the only company sixteen-year -old Annabelle has is paper, a pen, and the deep recesses of her creative mind. But then she meets Peter. Ten years her senior, he’s her newfound muse.[LO1] Peter is handing out swing dance fliers at a park. She’s captivated by the way he carries himself, swinging around a charcoal lamppost, smile brighter than the sun. To Annabelle, it’s like he can fly. [WA2] Soon, he coerces her into a world full of kindness, swing dancing, and his strict Christianity. Awed by his apparently unbridled joy, Annabelle believes that if she could be like him, maybe she could be happy too.[LC1]

Writing stories [WA3] about Peter becomes her obsession. [LO2] She ignores the pain when her sister, Jane, comes home starving and filthy; when Jane falls for Jude, Peter’s depressed younger brother, and Jude becomes estranged from his own religion; and when Peter finds out about Jude’s struggles only to ignore them. Annabelle doesn’t notice. She can’t. She’s in another world. [WA4][LO3]

That is, until Jane and Jude convince Annabelle to run away with them. As they vandalize the house of Jane’s abusive ex-boyfriend, partake in a perspective-altering trip to the beach, and are forever changed by a deadly night on the train tracks, Annabelle begins to leave her obsession with Peter behind and realizes happiness isn’t some man who seems that way. [WA5][LO4]

Maybe happiness is something else.

THE EDGE OF HAPPINESS is a completed 56,000 word YA contemporary that will appeal to fans of Stephen Chbosky’s THE PERKS OF BEING A WALLFLOWER, Rachel Cohn’s YOU KNOW WHERE TO FIND ME, and Adam Silvera’s MORE HAPPY THAN NOT. Readers will identify with its shy, relatable narrator and the dark situations she faces.



**********

Whitley's Notes:
[WA1]: Is the drug addict important information? Can’t you just say “runs away.”
[WA2]: These three sentences need to be cut down and condensed into one.
[WA3]: What kind of stories is she writing? About things he’s done? About things she thinks he could do? Completely fantastical things? Also, is she only writing stories about him? Or is she spending time with him too? It’s not clear to me, and they could take the story in vastly different directions.
[WA4]: If Annabelle isn’t noticing these plot points, then I’m not sure what the plot is. 
[WA5]: Again, this is a very reactionary pitch. I don’t know what Annabelle is doing, just what others are doing around her.

Laura's Notes:
[LC1]: I’m not hooked. The extraneous information about Peter and Annabelle’s feelings toward him could be presented in the novel. In a query, it’s time to present the conflict of the novel. I would stop here.


Lorin's Notes:
[LO1]: These details feel a bit overly specific and are alluded to in the next sentences.
[LO2]: Does she do this in service to a greater end? Does she hope to have them published, to get somewhere in particular with them?
[LO3]: Assuming she’s the protagonist and central viewpoint character, I have a question about a) how the dramatic action and conflicts will reach me, as a reader, and b) whether it’s the best choice to cast your main character into an inert/passive role of ignoring the world around her.
[LO4]: Without a sense of Annabelle being the driving force of the novel, whose desires promise to carry us somewhere compelling as readers, I would have to pass on this.


First 250 words:


The first time I met Happiness, I was at the park[LC1][LO1]. It was summer, and my day had been filled with the usual ritual: walking downtown, past the little antique shops and old brick buildings, searching for something to spark my imagination. Then, I’d walk to the small grass area dubbed “Hudsonville Grand Park” where I would write. I wrote a lot. Especially during the summer, when the tediousness of high school lectures and mediocre grades and wearing all black, lipstick included, to scare off any form of socialization faded into bright pink workout shorts [WA1] and time. [LO2] Time to write. Time to create.[LC2]

Today’s creation was Blake Metal from the record store down the street. His last name wasn’t really “Metal” but Schwartz. People from our high school just called him Metal because that’s what he listened to. The noise skyrocketed out of his headphones whenever he slept in the back of our chemistry class, shoulder length brown hair falling past his lip ring and onto a bare, pencil-less desk. He was the type of tall, misfit, lanky guy that got stoned every day and claimed to know every good song that was put on a record. “Music elitists,” my sister would call them.[LO3]

This morning while I walked by the record store, I saw him opening up the blinds. He had a black eye. Dark green and purple, swollen, it seemed too colorful to have been an accident. He had to have gotten it from a fight. [WA2][LO4]



**********

Whitley's Notes:
[WA1]: This doesn’t work for me on a couple levels. (1) all black = loner is an old and overdone stereotype. And (2) this leave me with no sense of Annabelle’s actual identity
[WA2]: Overall, these first 250 words feel like info dump. We know what Annabelle does in the summer. We know Blake’s background. But we don’t have a sense of scene (other than “park”), and we don’t know who/what Happiness is.


Laura's Notes:
[LC1]: Not interested in this sentence. Emotions personified feel cliché. For all I know, Happiness could be the name of a dog, or a hippie next door neighbor, or the nickname of a child.
[LC2]: I’d stop reading here. The voice sounds more nostalgic – an adult looking back on a time as a teenager, rather than the voice of a teenager. The YA audience can spot this instantly. Perhaps this is more suited for adult, where the nostalgic voice is accepted.


Lorin's Notes:
[LO1]: Promising opening.
[LO2]: I know what you mean to suggest here, but this feels a bit labored.
[LO3]: This feels like an awful lot of detail for someone who may not be an important figure in the story (based on the query). Also, this exposition keeps us at a distance from a specific setting and time. You’re describing his general attributes and behavior, not bringing us into a single moment of interaction between Metal and Annabelle.
[LO4]: It seems as though you’re making a promise with the opening line that you don’t fulfill in the paragraphs that follow. I’d suggest really honing this and getting us to her interaction with Peter much sooner.  I’d also be much more interested in the piece if we found Annabelle engaged in some compelling activity right away. We could use a bit more pressure on her, and on the story, to urge us along in the narrative. I feel like I know much more about Metal than I do about Annabelle, and were the opposite the case, it might be easier for any potential reader (agent, editor, etc.) to be borne into the piece.


Results:


Whitley: PASS 
Laura: PASS
Lorin: PASS